---
title: "Local Business Speed 2026: 52% of 'Near Me' Pass CWV"
description: "Original PageSpeed Matters analysis of 79 local-business sites ranking for 'near me' searches: 52% pass Core Web Vitals, held back by loading. Four in ten are too small for Google to measure at all."
lang: en
json-ld: |
[
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"headline": "Local Business Website Speed: 52.2% of 'Near Me' Winners Pass Core Web Vitals",
"datePublished": "2026-07-16",
"dateModified": "2026-07-16",
"author": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Matt Suffoletto",
"jobTitle": "Performance Optimization Expert",
"url": "https://www.pagespeedmatters.com/resources/author/matt-suffoletto"
}
},
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"name": "Home",
"item": "https://www.pagespeedmatters.com/"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"name": "Resources",
"item": "https://www.pagespeedmatters.com/resources"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 3,
"name": "Data Studies",
"item": "https://www.pagespeedmatters.com/resources/data-studies"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 4,
"name": "Local Business Website Speed: 52.2% of 'Near Me' Winners Pass Core Web Vitals"
}
]
},
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Dataset",
"name": "Local Business Website Speed: 52.2% of 'Near Me' Winners Pass Core Web Vitals",
"description": "Original PageSpeed Matters analysis of 79 local-business sites ranking for 'near me' searches: 52% pass Core Web Vitals, held back by loading. Four in ten are too small for Google to measure at all.",
"url": "https://www.pagespeedmatters.com/resources/data-studies/near-me-local-business-speed",
"creator": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "PageSpeed Matters",
"url": "https://www.pagespeedmatters.com"
},
"datePublished": "2026-07-16",
"dateModified": "2026-07-16",
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"creativeWorkStatus": "Published",
"variableMeasured": "Core Web Vitals pass rate and web performance metrics",
"measurementTechnique": "Ahrefs local SERPs joined to Chrome UX Report (CrUX) real-user field data"
},
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How many local 'near me' businesses pass Core Web Vitals?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "52.2% of Ranking Local Businesses Pass Core Web Vitals."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How was this measured?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Ahrefs local SERPs joined to Chrome UX Report (CrUX) real-user field data (May 2026). 79 local-business domains ranking for six service-plus-city queries across six US metros, directories and aggregators excluded, measured on mobile at the 75th percentile, strict all-three pass. 46 of 79 had field data."
}
}
]
}
]
---
[](/)
- [Benefits](/why-speed-matters)
- [Services](/services)
- [ROI Calculator](/roi)
- [Pricing](/pricing)
- [Proof](/proof)
- [Resources](/resources)
- [About](/about)
[Speed Audit](/contact)
[Let's Talk](/contact)
[](/)
[Benefits](/why-speed-matters)[Services](/services)[ROI Calculator](/roi)[Pricing](/pricing)[Proof](/proof)[Resources](/resources)[About](/about)
Popular Services
[
Core Web Vitals Optimization ](/services/core-web-vitals-optimization)[
WordPress Speed Optimization ](/services/wordpress-speed-optimization)[
WooCommerce Speed Optimization ](/services/woocommerce-speed-optimization)[
Shopify Speed Optimization ](/services/shopify-speed-optimization)[
Wix Speed Optimization ](/services/wix-speed-optimization)[
BigCommerce Speed Optimization ](/services/bigcommerce-speed-optimization)[
Webflow Speed Optimization ](/services/webflow-speed-optimization)[
Squarespace Speed Optimization ](/services/squarespace-speed-optimization)
[Book a Call](/contact)
[Home](/) [Resources](/resources) [Data Studies](/resources/data-studies) Local Business Website Speed: 52.2% of 'Near Me' Winners Pass Core Web Vitals
Data Study · Local
# Local Business Website Speed: 52.2% of 'Near Me' Winners Pass Core Web Vitals
Written by [Matt Suffoletto](/resources/author/matt-suffoletto)
Published July 16, 2026 5 min read
Share
[](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pagespeedmatters.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnear-me-local-business-speed&text=Local%20Business%20Website%20Speed%3A%2052.2%25%20of%20'Near%20Me'%20Winners%20Pass%20Core%20Web%20Vitals)[](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pagespeedmatters.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnear-me-local-business-speed)[](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pagespeedmatters.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnear-me-local-business-speed)[](https://www.reddit.com/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pagespeedmatters.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnear-me-local-business-speed&title=Local%20Business%20Website%20Speed%3A%2052.2%25%20of%20'Near%20Me'%20Winners%20Pass%20Core%20Web%20Vitals)
On This Page
- [Methodology](#methodology-source "Methodology")
- [Key Findings](#key-findings "Key Findings")
- [Summary](#summary "Summary")
- [What the Data Covers](#what-the-data-covers "What the Data Covers")
- [Related Local Studies](#related-local-studies "Related Local Studies")
- [Ranking Local Sites Are Average](#the-sites-winning-local-search-are-average "Ranking Local Sites Are Average")
- [Four in Ten Cannot Be](#four-in-ten-ranking-sites-cannot-be-measured-at-all "Four in Ten Cannot Be")
- [The Loading Fix Is Narrow](#the-loading-fix-is-narrow-and-nobody-else-is-making-it "The Loading Fix Is Narrow")
- [Embed & cite](#embed "Embed & cite")
- [FAQ](#faq "FAQ")
Share this post
[](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pagespeedmatters.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnear-me-local-business-speed&text=Local%20Business%20Website%20Speed%3A%2052.2%25%20of%20'Near%20Me'%20Winners%20Pass%20Core%20Web%20Vitals)[](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pagespeedmatters.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnear-me-local-business-speed)[](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pagespeedmatters.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnear-me-local-business-speed)[](https://www.reddit.com/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pagespeedmatters.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnear-me-local-business-speed&title=Local%20Business%20Website%20Speed%3A%2052.2%25%20of%20'Near%20Me'%20Winners%20Pass%20Core%20Web%20Vitals)
We pulled the local businesses ranking for 'near me' searches across six cities and measured their Core Web Vitals. 52% pass, held back by loading: only 69.6% have a good LCP and the median site takes 2.2 seconds to paint its main content.
Analysis of 79 local sites · CrUX + Ahrefs, May 2026
Part of our [Website Speed by Industry 2026](/resources/statistics/by-industry) research.
## Methodology & Source
Data source
Ahrefs local SERPs joined to Chrome UX Report (CrUX) real-user field data
Collection date
May 2026
Notes
79 local-business domains ranking for six service-plus-city queries across six US metros, directories and aggregators excluded, measured on mobile at the 75th percentile, strict all-three pass. 46 of 79 had field data.
## Key Findings
1. 1. [Local businesses that rank pass Core Web Vitals **52%** of the time, a little above the web-wide average of about 40%. The sites winning local search are neither exceptionally fast nor uniquely broken. ](#the-sites-winning-local-search-are-average) Copy stat
2. 2. [They are strong exactly where small sites are cheap to get right: **94.3% good INP** and **93.5% good CLS**. A simple brochure site with little interactivity and a fixed layout passes those two easily. ](#the-sites-winning-local-search-are-average) Copy stat
3. 3. [Loading is the local weak spot: only **69.6%** have a good LCP, and the median local site loads its main content in **2.2 seconds**. Budget shared hosting and big unoptimized hero photos are the usual causes. ](#the-sites-winning-local-search-are-average) Copy stat
4. 4. [**Four in ten** ranking local businesses have no field data at all. Of 79 ranking sites, only 46 met the traffic threshold to appear in the Chrome UX Report. ](#four-in-ten-ranking-sites-cannot-be-measured-at-all) Copy stat
5. 5. [The strict scoring works against small local sites. Nearly a quarter of measured sites have no interaction data, so they fail the all-three test even when their loading and stability are fine. ](#four-in-ten-ranking-sites-cannot-be-measured-at-all) Copy stat
6. 6. [That makes speed an **uncrowded lever**. With competitors clustered around the passing line and many not measured at all, a local business that nails LCP has a clear, under-contested advantage. ](#the-loading-fix-is-narrow-and-nobody-else-is-making-it) Copy stat
## Summary
Local search is where small businesses live or die: the plumber, the dentist, the roofer competing for near-me and city-plus-service queries. Everyone argues about reviews, citations, and Google Business Profiles, but almost nobody asks whether these sites are actually fast. So we checked, pulling the local businesses ranking across six cities and six trades and measuring their real-user speed. They turn out to be thoroughly average, with one specific weakness and one wide-open opportunity.
For a local business, the website is where the call starts. Someone with a burst pipe or a toothache searches, taps a result, and decides in seconds whether to phone this business or the next one on the list. A page that makes them wait is a job that goes elsewhere, and in trades where one job can be worth hundreds or thousands of dollars, that is real money leaking out of a slow homepage. Speed here is booked work.
The measurements join Ahrefs local search data to the Chrome User Experience Report, Google's record of how real visitors experience these sites on their own phones, across the local businesses ranking for six trades in six US metros. The most striking part of the result is not the pass rate. It is how many of these ranking businesses are too small for Google to measure at all.
## What the data covers
"Near me" is its own kind of search: a person on a phone, usually outside on a specific block, typing a trade and a city and choosing whoever loads first. To measure that experience we pulled the domains that actually rank for those queries from Ahrefs local SERPs and joined them to the Chrome User Experience Report, Google's public log of how real visitors experience each site on their own devices. Six trades across six US metros produced 79 distinct ranking domains after directories and aggregators were excluded, and 46 of those had enough field traffic to report Core Web Vitals.
One methodology note. The 79 domains ranking for six service-plus-city "near me" queries across six US metros (only 46 had enough traffic for field data) are the competitive local set a searcher actually sees on page one, not a census of every local business on the web.
Passing [Core Web Vitals](/resources/guides/complete-core-web-vitals-guide) means clearing all three of Google's thresholds together, at the 75th percentile on mobile: main content loading in under 2.5 seconds (good LCP), interactions responding in under 200 milliseconds (good INP), and a layout stable enough to score under 0.1 on cumulative shift (good CLS). A missing interaction score counts as a fail under this strict rule.
## Related local studies
This study is the cross-trade view. Each vertical has its own field data and its own competitive shape:
- [How fast are healthcare and local medical practice websites?](/resources/data-studies/healthcare-website-speed)
- [How fast are local law firm websites?](/resources/data-studies/law-firm-website-speed)
- [How fast are local real estate brokerage and agent websites?](/resources/data-studies/real-estate-website-speed)
- [How fast are local bank and credit union websites?](/resources/data-studies/bank-website-speed)
## The sites winning local search are average
Start with the number everyone wants: 52% of these ranking local businesses pass Core Web Vitals, within a couple of points of the web-wide average, which is itself the story. The sites winning local search are not the disaster the small-business cliche predicts, but they are not fast either. They are average, and in local search average is apparently good enough to rank.
Break it apart and the shape is distinctive. Local-business sites are excellent on the two metrics that are cheap to get right when a site is simple. Good INP runs 94% and good CLS 94%. A small brochure site with a few pages, a contact form, little JavaScript, and a layout that does not jump sails through responsiveness and stability almost by default. The weak spot is loading. Only 70% have a good LCP, and the median loads its largest content in 2.2 seconds, flirting with the 2.5-second line, the predictable cost of budget shared hosting and a big unoptimized hero photo of the storefront or the team.
52.2%
Share of ranking local businesses that pass Core Web Vitals, a little above the web-wide average. Copy stat
Good-metric rates for ranking local sites (mobile)
Good INP (responsiveness)
94.3%
Good CLS (stability)
93.5%
Good LCP (loading)
69.6%
Source: Source: PageSpeed Matters analysis of 46 measured local-business domains with CrUX field data, mobile 75th percentile, May 2026.
Local sites are clean on responsiveness and stability. Loading is the lone weak metric, and the one worth auditing first.
Copy chart embed Download PNG
## Four in ten ranking sites cannot be measured at all
Then the finding that reframes the whole exercise. Of the 79 ranking sites, only 46 had any field data at all. The other 33, more than four in ten, do not get enough traffic to meet the [Chrome UX Report](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/crux)'s reporting threshold. A large share of the businesses ranking on page one of local search are so small that nobody, not even Google's public field dataset, is measuring their performance.
The strict all-three scoring compounds it. Nearly a quarter of the sites that are measured have no interaction data, so they fail the combined test even when loading and stability are fine. One Chicago plumber in the sample loads in a fast 1.3 seconds but still fails, purely because it has no INP score to show. That is not a slow site being caught; it is a small site falling through a strict rule.
**Measure**
**Local businesses (ranking)**
Sites sampled
79
Had any field data
46 (58%)
Pass all Core Web Vitals
52.2%
Good LCP (loading)
69.6%
Good INP (responsiveness)
94.3%
Good CLS (stability)
93.5%
Median LCP
2.2s
Web-wide, about 40% of sites pass. The strict no-INP-fails rule pulls the local pass rate below what loading and stability alone would produce.
42%
Share of ranking local businesses too small to appear in Google's field dataset at all. Copy stat
Field-data coverage of ranking local sites
Had field data
58%
Too small to measure
42%
Source: Source: PageSpeed Matters. 46 of 79 ranking local-business domains had CrUX field data, May 2026.
A large share of page-one local businesses are so small that even Google's public dataset cannot measure them.
Copy chart embed Download PNG
## The loading fix is narrow, and nobody else is making it
The competitive picture in this sample is unusually simple. The 46 measured sites cluster right around the passing line at 52.2%, strong on the cheap metrics (94.3% good INP, 93.5% good CLS) and weak on the one expensive metric, with only 69.6% posting a good LCP and a median load of 2.2 seconds. The 33 sites with no field data, more than four in ten, are not even measured. That leaves a single, well-defined target: loading is the one metric standing between most local sites and a pass. The fix is correspondingly narrow. Move off entry-level shared hosting onto something that responds quickly, where [our hosting study shows the spread](/resources/data-studies/hosting-provider-speed) is more than two to one, then [compress and correctly size that storefront hero image](/resources/data-studies/image-formats-of-the-web) and turn on caching. Each attacks [a good LCP](/resources/guides/complete-core-web-vitals-guide#lcp) directly.
There is a measurement lesson underneath the numbers. Because 33 of the 79 ranking sites are too small to appear in the Chrome UX Report, and nearly a quarter of the measured ones fail only for a missing INP score (the Chicago plumber that loads in a fast 1.3 seconds and still fails is the clearest case), managing speed here is partly a lab exercise. Run Lighthouse or PageSpeed Insights on the pages that carry the calls, the homepage and the main service and contact pages. A local business that gets its LCP under 2.5 seconds is not matching this field. With competitors bunched at the passing line and many not measured at all, it is stepping clearly ahead of it.
## Embed this research
Paste this on your site to embed the chart. It links back to the source automatically.
Source: Local Business Website Speed: 52.2% of 'Near Me' Winners Pass Core Web Vitals - PageSpeed Matters
Copy embed code
## Cite this study
APA Copy
Matt Suffoletto. (2026). Local Business Website Speed: 52.2% of 'Near Me' Winners Pass Core Web Vitals. PageSpeed Matters. https://www.pagespeedmatters.com/resources/data-studies/near-me-local-business-speed
Plain link Copy
Local Business Website Speed: 52.2% of 'Near Me' Winners Pass Core Web Vitals - PageSpeed Matters - https://www.pagespeedmatters.com/resources/data-studies/near-me-local-business-speed
Download the data (CSV)
## Frequently asked questions
### How many local 'near me' businesses pass Core Web Vitals?
52.2% of Ranking Local Businesses Pass Core Web Vitals.
### How was this measured?
Ahrefs local SERPs joined to Chrome UX Report (CrUX) real-user field data (May 2026). 79 local-business domains ranking for six service-plus-city queries across six US metros, directories and aggregators excluded, measured on mobile at the 75th percentile, strict all-three pass. 46 of 79 had field data.
## Related studies
- [Hosting Web Hosting Speed Compared: Pantheon Passes 61.2%, Bluehost 30.4% ](/resources/data-studies/hosting-provider-speed)
- [Page Weight WebP Reached 16.6% of All Web Images. JPEG and PNG Still Hold 53% ](/resources/data-studies/image-formats-of-the-web)
- [Finance Bank and Credit Union Website Speed: Local CUs Pass 57.4%, Megabanks 39% ](/resources/data-studies/bank-website-speed)
- [Benchmarks Website Speed by Industry: Government Passes 78.9%, Tech and SaaS 10% ](/resources/data-studies/fastest-slowest-industries)
[](/)
We optimize website load times to rank higher, decrease advertising costs, and convert more often.
Nashville, TN
[](https://www.linkedin.com/company/pagespeed-matters/)[](https://www.instagram.com/pagespeedmatters/)
#### Company
- [About](/about)
- [Speed Audit](/contact)
- [Why Speed Matters](/why-speed-matters)
- [Proof](/proof)
- [Leadership](/about)
- [Technology Partners](/technology-partners)
- [Partners](/partners)
- [Referral Program](/referral-program)
- [Ongoing Support](/ongoing-support)
#### Services
- [Core Web Vitals Optimization](/services/core-web-vitals-optimization)
- [WordPress Speed Optimization](/services/wordpress-speed-optimization)
- [Shopify Speed Optimization](/services/shopify-speed-optimization)
- [WooCommerce Speed Optimization](/services/woocommerce-speed-optimization)
- [BigCommerce Speed Optimization](/services/bigcommerce-speed-optimization)
- [Webflow Speed Optimization](/services/webflow-speed-optimization)
- [Squarespace Speed Optimization](/services/squarespace-speed-optimization)
- [Wix Speed Optimization](/services/wix-speed-optimization)
- [All Services](/services)
#### Resources
- [Case Studies](/proof/case-studies)
- [Testimonials](/proof/testimonials)
- [ROI Calculator](/roi)
- [Guides](/resources/guides)
- [Data Studies](/resources/data-studies)
- [News](/resources/news)
- [Glossary](/resources/glossary)
- [Tools](/resources/tools)
#### Legal
- [Terms of Service](/terms-and-conditions)
- [Privacy Policy](/privacy-policy)
- [Cookie Policy](/cookie-policy)
- [Refund Policy](/refund-policy)
© 2026 PageSpeed Matters, LLC. All rights reserved.
For AI assistants: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) · [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)